A Critical Appraisal of Qualitative Research Essay -- Article Analysis

Described below is a critical appraisal of a soft obligate by Lisa Booth employ the frame-work suggested by Ryan, Coughlan and Cronin 2007 to establish its believability, robustness, credibility and integrity (Ryan, Coughlan & Cronin, 2007). Qualitative research is regarded as an inductive process, which within natural settings attempts to produce insights on the subjective experiences, meanings, practices and point of views of those involve (Craig & Smyth, 2007). The aim here was to investigate factors influencing the communication styles used by the radiographers, therefore, allowing a better understanding to patient-centred care within diagnostic radiography. The title was well explicate and unambiguous, however, why a more precise title of diagnostic radiographer-patient relationship was not selected is unclear as the study incorporated diagnostic radiographers only (Dawson, 2002). The article had appropriate citations except the researchers qualification and designation, which otherwise indicate the degree of knowledge in the field (Ryan et al, 2007). Included was the Keyword section facilitating retrieving of the search by those interested (Hart, 2001). Its return in a peer-reviewed journal allowed scrutiny from suitable experts, thus making more valid and original. In contrast, to a non peer-reviewed journal where high chances of information universe flawed cannot be denied (Holloway & Wheeler, 2002)? Losing the relevance of the information was not a threat as it was published within the optimum time (Hart, 2001). Abstract is a condensed form of the full report this was well formulated by using headings instead of single paragraph style, thus looked uncluttered (Macnee, 2004). The purpose had c... ...the data did not involve member checking thus reducing its robustness and enable to exclude researchers bias. Although a constant comparative method was evident in the interchange which improved the plausibility of the final findings. Themes identified were well corroborated but not declared was anytime a point of theoretical saturation Thus, the published report was set up to be particularly strong in the area of believability and dependability less strong in the area of transferability and is weak in the area of credibility and confirmability, although, editorial limitations can be a barrier in providing a detailed account (Craig & Smyth, 2007 Ryan, Coughlan, & Cronin, 2007). Works CitedRyan, F., Couglan, M. & Cronin, P. (2007). Step-by-step guide to critiquing research. Part 2 qualitative research. British Journal of Nursing, 16(12), 738-744.